Wondering if Cost Segregation is worth it for your property? Click here to see your potential tax savings in under 1 minute with our free calculator

Project Summary

An engineering firm developing a custom vibration isolation platform for a semiconductor fabrication facility, where standard isolation mounts could not meet the sub-micron displacement tolerances required by lithography equipment, engaged CSSI to evaluate their R&D Tax Credit eligibility. CSSI’s engineering-based analysis delivered a Total State Credit of $264,587 and a Total Federal Credit of $384,354.

Project Overview

To qualify for the R&D Tax Credit, each activity must satisfy the IRS four-part test. CSSI’s analysis confirmed that the qualifying activities identified for this company met all four criteria:

  • Business Component: Engineering structural isolation to meet precision manufacturing tolerances.
  • Elimination of Uncertainty: Uncertainty existed around whether a passive isolation system could attenuate adjacent HVAC and process equipment frequencies without introducing resonance at the equipment’s operational range.
  • Process of Experimentation: Engineers built finite element models, ran modal analysis to identify resonant frequencies, and iterated on bearing stiffness and damping materials until displacement targets were met under simulated operating loads.
  • Technological in Nature: Grounded in structural dynamics, mechanical engineering, and materials science.

Employee Wages

$9,351,987

Supply and Contractor Costs

$0.00

Total QRE’s

$4,158,122

Total State Credit

$264,587

Total Federal Credit

$384,354

Study Results

The analysis identified a total of $4,158,122 in Qualifying Research Expenses (QREs) for the tax year. Because the company’s R&D activities were performed entirely in-house, employee wages accounted for 100% of the QRE figure, $4,158,122 of $9,351,987 in total payroll qualified as research wages under IRC §41. No contractor or supply costs were identified. Based on those qualifying expenses, the study produced a federal R&D Tax Credit of $384,354 and a state R&D Tax Credit of $264,587, for a total tax credit benefit of $648,941.

Key Takeaways

  • Engineering firms solving novel technical challenges for clients are often strong R&D Tax Credit candidates. Custom design, simulation, and iteration aimed at performance requirements that standard solutions can’t meet frequently satisfy the four-part test.
  • In-house R&D can fully qualify on wages alone. This engagement produced over $4.1 million in QREs with no contractor or supply costs, proof that firms with strong internal engineering talent don’t need outside spend to generate a meaningful credit.
  • Combining federal and state credits can significantly increase total benefit. Here, the state credit added $264,587 on top of $384,354 federal, for a total of $648,941.
  • Documentation is what makes the credit defensible. Existing design records, simulation outputs, and iteration history supported each component of the four-part test, the foundation of CSSI’s engineering-based approach.
  • Many firms performing this work have never claimed the credit. Engineering companies often assume custom client work doesn’t qualify, when in fact the iterative problem-solving inherent to advanced design is exactly what the credit was designed to incentivize.

Ready to Discover Your R&D Tax Credits Potential?

If your company is developing or improving products, formulas, or processes, you may be leaving significant tax credits on the table. CSSI’s engineering-based approach ensures every qualifying activity is identified, documented, and defensible, so you capture the full value of the work your team is already doing.

Request a Free Analysis today and find out what your business could qualify for.




866-757-6484